Stealth Attacks

[Trickster]

There was a bug that swapped visibility of Wraith and Portal. It is fixed in actual version. Plus visibilities of all stealth programs were raised up by 10%.

[Fantöm]

There was a bug that swapped visibility of Wraith and Portal. It is fixed in actual version. Plus visibilities of all stealth programs were raised up by 10%.

Is it a visual bug or not? Because I once used a Wraith (Scanner was deactivated) and instead of costing 110, it cost me over 270.

[Trickster]

Is it a visual bug or not? Because I once used a Wraith (Scanner was deactivated) and instead of costing 110, it cost me over 270.

We changed visibility of all staealth programs from total visibility to per second visibility. It was confusing when Data leeches had it per second, the network counts it per second, access installs in a second etc.

If scanner was deactivated I guess it cost you 220 (2s * 110).

[Aladeen]

Is it a visual bug or not? Because I once used a Wraith (Scanner was deactivated) and instead of costing 110, it cost me over 270.

We changed visibility of all staealth programs from total visibility to per second visibility. It was confusing when Data leeches had it per second, the network counts it per second, access installs in a second etc.

If scanner was deactivated I guess it cost you 220 (2s * 110).

Well done, this is much better......

[Fantöm]

If scanner was deactivated I guess it cost you 220 (2s * 110).

Isn't it supposed to be 55/s ? I'm confused.

[Trickster]

If scanner was deactivated I guess it cost you 220 (2s * 110).

Isn't it supposed to be 55/s ? I'm confused.

That was the old system. The new one shows all programs visibility per second. But I understand it maight be confusing because as I mentioned somewhere else, there was a bug swapping numbers for Wraith and Portal.

All in all this new system is more transparent and coherent and the numbers are finally as designed.

[Fantöm]

If scanner was deactivated I guess it cost you 220 (2s * 110).

Isn't it supposed to be 55/s ? I'm confused.

That was the old system. The new one shows all programs visibility per second. But I understand it maight be confusing because as I mentioned somewhere else, there was a bug swapping numbers for Wraith and Portal.

All in all this new system is more transparent and coherent and the numbers are finally as designed.

Gotcha! Thanks

[catmantj]

Sorry this may be the wrong sections , please can you add a way to test designs maybe you have to pay like 50$ and you can test without using your database hacks. please add this as it would really help to make layouts better thank you.

[theintelligentboy]

Sorry this may be the wrong sections , please can you add a way to test designs maybe you have to pay like 50$ and you can test without using your database hacks. please add this as it would really help to make layouts better thank you.

That's a good idea. But then pro hackers would be unbreakable, as they would test the Network until its sustainable, costing just 50 bucks.

Probably current system is not that bad.

[Gream]

That's a good idea. But then pro hackers would be unbreakable, as they would test the Network until its sustainable, costing just 50 bucks.

Probably current system is not that bad.

In my opinion, there is nothing like "unbreakable" network... For every kind of defense, attacker (on similar level) can always compile such library to break through the defense.

Apart from that, waiting for "how long my newly rebuild network will survive against attackers" is a part of fun.