So do you think these codes from slightly off patterns are useless?Luminaar wrote:The single binary code I've revealed was an accidental one while trying to recreate a code. On translation, it returned 8 letters and zero numbers. I don't believe you'd have to go to the trouble of generating plenty of red herring codes. Maybe there's just a second checksum to weed out accidental codes that coincidentally fit the bill?
All of the codes I translated had letters or common symbols like '!' or '`'. Of the four I have none had numbers.