Page 1 of 1

Stealth attacks timer should be in descending order

Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:03 pm
by Mozirilla
Yes, currently it's confusing us to determine exactly when we should place our last move in Stealth attack because of "ascending timer order"..! We can't figure out when it will be ended!

Do you have another opinion?

Re: Stealth attacks timer should be in descending order

Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:20 pm
by legal
Mozirilla wrote:Yes, currently it's confusing us to determine exactly when we should place our last move in Stealth attack because of "ascending timer order"..! We can't figure out when it will be ended!

Do you have another opinion?
actually it is actually easy the max is 3600 and if a program takes 120 /s and the install time is 1 second then you subtract the install time from 3600 and that is how much stealth you have left. its not rocket science. Even with a scanner you can can calculate out what your end will be. This is all basic stuff taught in 5th grade. maybe it is just to hard for you, and you should just stick to brute force attacks till they cover this in school.

Re: Stealth attacks timer should be in descending order

Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 4:11 pm
by Mozirilla
Wooo.. I have been crashed... :lol: :lol:

Alright alright.. This is your opinion.. Others might have another..

Re: Stealth attacks timer should be in descending order

Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 4:15 pm
by legal
Mozirilla wrote:Wooo.. I have been crashed... :lol: :lol:

Alright alright.. This is your opinion.. Others might have another..
just saying reverse the process that is all i am saying. You are making it more complicated than it really is.

Re: Stealth attacks timer should be in descending order

Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 7:47 pm
by theintelligentboy
legal wrote:
Mozirilla wrote:Wooo.. I have been crashed... :lol: :lol:

Alright alright.. This is your opinion.. Others might have another..
just saying reverse the process that is all i am saying. You are making it more complicated than it really is.

Its a very good idea indeed. The brute-force timer goes reversely, why not Stealth? Because Stealth requires much more time utilization than bute-force.