MONOLISK - Suggestions

Cassiopeia
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2019 1:42 am

Re: MONOLISK - Suggestions

Post by Cassiopeia » Mon Jun 22, 2020 8:03 pm

Erric wrote:
Tue Mar 24, 2020 10:05 pm
Cassiopeia: There is more healing coming in the next content update! It will be available for all clases.
Heya,

Overall, I like a lot of the new content. The new monster and new things you can add to some shards. I think, however, there was still a big oversight when it came to some melee hero survivability. Warrior seems to be okay still. Here are a couple of suggestions to make the Shadow and Artificer heroes more viable in most shards players make:

Shadow: if an enemy is Blinded and you Dodge their attack, damage should be reduced to 0. When players make shards where you have to fight 10+ Skeletal Giants at once, you currently still take damage and die even though it seems that the combo of Blind+Dodge should make this challenge possible.

Artificer: change the functionality of Augrmnted Fists to something like: "Has a 30% chance to give 1 charge to all abilities when you reflect damage." You essentially gave this functionality to Warriors in the update, but Artificers needed it a lot more. Like, a billion times more. This will allow Artificers to get their one and only heal back up. Your Reflect Armor set is fun, but it comes at huge costs. Ranged units kill off Reflect Artificers pretty fast. Since Augmented Fists was designed to go with the Reflect Armor set but currently provides poor synergy with it, the proposed change would be great.

Oh, and why do ranged enemy units not take reflect damage still?

User avatar
Fuhrer_51[RUS]
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2020 4:20 pm

Re: MONOLISK - Suggestions

Post by Fuhrer_51[RUS] » Sun Dec 06, 2020 4:37 pm

There is one sentence on the topic of communication. As you all know, there is no chat in the game and all possible contact is reduced only to comments. Overall, it makes sense. However, there are also certain inconveniences here. For example: I cannot know if someone replied to my comment until I purposefully look in and check it, and if I didn’t remember the author and the name of the card, then we can assume that I will never know if I was answered.
Why not introduce a subscription system or something like that under certain cards? It would be possible to receive notifications about responses, for example, in the profile menu, in the same place as notifications about subscribers.
_201206183855.jpeg
_201206183855.jpeg (232.05 KiB) Viewed 610 times
_201206184326.jpeg
_201206184326.jpeg (153.79 KiB) Viewed 610 times
_201206193240.jpeg
_201206193240.jpeg (118.65 KiB) Viewed 610 times
You see... If you left a comment under any card, then you will not receive information about the author's answer in any way until he notifies you about it, having passed one of your cards, or if you yourself do not check the presence of a knock replicas. It seems to me that this function has a right to exist. This would make it much easier to receive both feedback and reactions to it. )

User avatar
Fuhrer_51[RUS]
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2020 4:20 pm

Re: MONOLISK - Suggestions

Post by Fuhrer_51[RUS] » Tue Dec 08, 2020 4:07 pm

One more thing.
Have you ever had that after completing a company or level, you liked them so much that you would like to leave them for possible replay? Or do you want to track the progress of changes to someone's work?
Adding to favorites.

The icons are just examples and do not represent the final version.
_201208183401.jpeg
_201208183401.jpeg (217.17 KiB) Viewed 594 times
_201208183428.jpeg
_201208183428.jpeg (207.19 KiB) Viewed 594 times

User avatar
Fuhrer_51[RUS]
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2020 4:20 pm

Re: MONOLISK - Suggestions

Post by Fuhrer_51[RUS] » Tue Dec 08, 2020 4:09 pm

The presumptive location of the menu is in the profile, next to the message key from the previous sentence.
_201208180043.jpeg
_201208180043.jpeg (147.58 KiB) Viewed 594 times
_201208185533.jpeg
_201208185533.jpeg (182.57 KiB) Viewed 594 times
_201208180719.jpeg
_201208180719.jpeg (142 KiB) Viewed 594 times

Post Reply